Bullseye Code Coverage [work] [VERIFIED]
of 100% would be achieved if a single test calls validate_user(25, true, false) . All lines execute. But have you tested all logical possibilities?
// Original code if (temperature > 100 && pressure < 50) activate_alarm(); bullseye code coverage
set(CMAKE_C_COMPILER "covc" CACHE STRING "") set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER "covc" CACHE STRING "") set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_LAUNCHER "" CACHE STRING "") set(CMAKE_C_COMPILER_ARG1 "--compiler" CACHE STRING "") set(CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER_ARG1 "--compiler" CACHE STRING "") export PATH=/usr/local/bullseye/bin:$PATH covselect --add --on # Turn on coverage measurement cmake -DCMAKE_TOOLCHAIN_FILE=bullseye-toolchain.cmake .. covbuild cmake --build . --parallel Step 3: Run Tests & Capture Data cov01 -1 # Reset counters to zero ./bin/my_unit_tests covrun ./bin/integration_tests Step 4: Merge & Report covmerge -a *.cov # Merge all .cov files into one covhtml --title "Sprint 23 Coverage" -o coverage_html coverage.cov Step 5: Set a Quality Gate In your CI script, fail the build if decision coverage drops below 80%: of 100% would be achieved if a single
covmetric -p coverage.cov | grep "Decision Coverage" | awk 'if ($3 < 80) exit 1' The landscape has shifted. Here's when to choose Bullseye vs. newer tools: // Original code if (temperature > 100 &&